Hi, Lyn. I'm reluctant to get specific for fear of someone taking it the wrong way and ruining the message (no one can see much of my earnest warmth through text, no matter how careful the wording). But since you pointedly asked: no, none of what's listed here rings true. That isn't the same as saying something is false, just that the resonance of it doesn't move through me the way music might resonate through our mind-body (as dream symbols can resonate through our mind-spirit).
A quick side consideration (since it's related, I promise): If you are at a concert watching a pianist you do not personally know (or have any history with), and they have raised their hands to keys, and perhaps even caressed the first key, how do you know what the song is going to say to you or even mean to them? Does that act or single tone "ring true" to you as a complete piece when absorbed in its full context? I make the analogy specifically to impress reality-sense upon anyone who cares to learn more about the importance of context. We are awakened into an indescribably complex existence, and as far as anyone can tell, it's all interconnected--not even the vacuum/void is really "in a vacuum". This is backed up by science as we become sophisticated enough to learn about particles and waves and their interaction with *everything* around them, their
resonance in the greater weave of existence. For example, there is no box/category for the planet Earth separate from everything around it: the sun resonances, the near-"void", the magnetic particularities (heh, like our planet having a bad hair day while enjoying the solar winds).
Given our limited views of the vast interaction of relatively simple things, it seems
inconceivable that someone would treat dreams with such simplicity, as if they can simplify and get a ring of truth from the on-purpose mysterious! I will not make assumptions about your motivations other than to state it is deeply unsettling to me that you feel free to make such simple assertions about a song (to tie in the analogy) before the pianist has even played it. Does anyone like a reviewer who writes a review about something before experiencing it?
No offense to the OP, but that wasn't a detailed song more than a "come onto the stage, hit a note, and leave" performance. If I had bought a ticket to this show, I'd be asking for a refund.

There simply isn't enough of the song there to know *what* rings true; does that make sense? You must avoid feeling emotionally vested in "being right" to the point of ignoring the realities, unless I misread how serious you seem to be about dreaming and its affects and reasons-for-being. This is indeed a very serious and meaningful activity, but you
have to treat it as such! Again, I am reluctant to make an example of this post lest Pearce get upset (for the wrong reasons), but I truly want to help. Some of the details/context missing in this original post are the timings and impressions and emotions and personal take-aways--there is really nothing for us to truthfully address without that context. That's why it's supremely important to practice recalling all those little details and feelings rather than dismissing them as you wake up--because they are vital clues if you want to actually discuss the dreams (even just to have fun with them because they can be so whacky!).
There's tons of great examples in my novel as the students work at it and gain in skill of recall/sharing. To urge/instruct them, my counselor says something to the effect of, "Make up words if you have to. Anything to help us understand all the aspects of your dream--the more we have, the more we can play around with." And just as it does in real life, this constant practice unlocks deeper and more meaningful dreams for the students until they stumble into some amazing-surprising things! When I get more time, I will put out another example of a dream that I have been dwelling on as an example for you to sink your teeth into, so to speak, heh. Until then, please take this in the encouraging spirit in which it is offered.